Board Members Explain Their Vote on Facilities Master Plan
The CH-UH School Board voted 3-2 to approve the facilities master plan. Members explained why they supported or opposed the idea before voting. Here's what they had to say.
At Tuesday's regular Cleveland Heights-Univeristy Heights School Board meeting, members voted 3-2 to approve the facilities master plan, a $206.2 million project that will reconfigure and renovate buildings in the district and calls for closing three elementary schools.
Before starting the formal vote, each board member explained the difficulty they had making the decision and why he or she supported or opposed the plan. Browse the photos above to see excerpts of statements from each board member.
John Hubbard
4:06 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
:: It's important to note that 4 of the 5 Board of Education members acknowledged problems with the process. Let's wait for the November 2013 election and use the community's increased attention and engagement to craft a plan that can actually be called a community plan. As it stands now, "stepping up" will give us exactly the same kinds of problems we got when the community "stepped up" for open classrooms 40 years ago. July 17th provides a final opportunity for the board to do the right thing for the community and put the brakes on this flawed plan. Contact the board members and let them know you oppose moving forward. You can find contact information on the district website: http://www.chuh.org/district/board-of-education/meet-the-board.
Jake Crouse
8:51 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Mostly rather mottled and wrong-headed thinking from Register & Zucker ...equivalent of the old 4-corner stall offense. Karen Jones probably expressed herself, and the philosophy, best.
Bonnie Dolezal
10:25 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
I will be voting no as will all of my friends in Cleveland Heights University Heights. This is the wrong time to ask people for additional tax money. The board has lost all credibility by passing a levy in Nov. '11 with no mention of this upcoming issue.
SPH
10:35 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
I completely disagree with you Jake... just because you have something in front of you and something needs to be done, does not mean that the thing in front of you is the right thing to do. The district needs to seriously look at what is needed. Sure our buildings need some upkeep and we probably need to consolidate somewhat to save costs. But put what money we do have to better use. More assistance for the teachers in the way of supplies and support, better more essential field trips, go back to the basics of teaching and leave the technology behind at the lower levels. Half of those kids are better with technology than the parents. Stop playing lets keep up with the Jones' and do what is truly best for our kids. TEACH THEM.
Anne Caruso
7:23 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
The biggest problem I have with the plan is that the children do not remain in the same building for very long. This frequent changing of environments is not good for children and I'm concerned that attention wa not paid to the need for stability in relationships with friends and staff for the children.
John Hubbard
10:31 am on Friday, July 13, 2012
Please consider signing this petition essentially asking the CH-UH Board of Ed to allow a year of honest community dialog before asking our community for $130 Million.
http://www.change.org/petitions/cleveland-heights-university-heights-board-of-education-remove-plan-c-from-consideration-for-the-november-2012-ballot