patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Cleveland Heights City Council Passes Curfew Amendments

Curfew law now has six exceptions and allows the city manager designate other curfew areas in emergencies

 

City Council passed two amendments to a controversial curfew ordinance Tuesday night — one that adds six new exceptions to the law, and another that gives the city manager authority to designate new curfew zones during times of emergency.

The first amendment passed Tuesday explicitly states the six ways children under 18 can be in the designated curfew areas — right now the Coventry and Cedar Lee business districts — after 6 p.m.

Minors are exempt from the new curfew law:

  • when accompanied by a parent or guardian or an adult member of the family,
  • when the child is on an errand or legitimate business, like patronizing the library, under the “immediate direction and authorization” of the parent or guardian,
  • when employed in the area, but the minor must carry a written note signed by the parent or guardian or the employer stating the location and hours of employment,
  • when going to or returning home from a school, religious or volunteering activity, or a “place of public entertainment” like a movie, play or sporting event,
  • when attending a “controlled-admission recreation venue” (such as The Grog Shop or Cedar Lee Theatre), and
  • when the minor is exercising his or her First Amendment rights, which will require at least 24-hours notice and written communication to the police chief or designated agent that is signed by the minor and parent or guardian. The note will also have to include a home address, phone number and specify when, where and in what manner the minor will be.

Several council members said the exceptions resulted from discussions they and Mayor Ed Kelley had with affected business owners, residents and teens in the days since the original curfew law was passed June 27. That law was quickly passed just a few days after 16 teens were arrested when several fights broke out after the Coventry Street Arts Fair.

Councilwoman Cheryl Stephens said the original law was a response to the growing concern that people were feeling unsafe at area business districts like Coventry, but even as they passed it council members knew it would need to be tweaked.

“When most of you called us, we responded,” Stephens said, referring to the days immediately after the fights broke out. “We didn’t always get it perfectly right, we know that. But that’s why we’re amending the legislation and why we’ll continue to amend it until we get something most of us can live with.”

The exception dealing with attending a “controlled-admission recreation venue” came about after discussions with business owners, who feared the lack of minors after 6 p.m. would curb business considerably. Grog Shop owner Kathy Blackman thanked the Council for the exceptions, but said the ordinance was still “too extreme” and added that other Coventry business owners feel the same way, specifically that the 6 p.m. time is too early.

The teenagers who made up about half of the close to 40 people who attended Tuesday night’s meeting agreed with Blackman and felt they were being punished for something they didn’t do. Adin Colie, 20, said he feels bad for the kids who will be robbed of the memories and relationships developed through nights hanging out at the P.E.A.C.E. Park, then grabbing a bite to eat at one of the Coventry restaurants.

“The next generation is being prevented from having that life experience,” he said.

Kelley said that most of the teens involved in the chaos in Coventry were not from Cleveland Heights and the law was necessary to restore order.

“These kids are coming from places other than our city, and they’re taking away our rights,” he said. “We are standing up to them and we’re going to make this community the safest community in Cuyahoga County if not the state of Ohio.”

The mayor’s words came right before the unanimous passage of the two curfew amendments and were met with applause from nearly everyone in the audience inside council chambers.

The second amendment that was passed gives the city manager authority to designate other areas of the city as under the curfew ordinance should he or she receive information that a “‘Flash Mob’ or similar event involving the gathering of minors” would pose a threat. The designation would only apply for the “minimum amount of time” necessary for the threat to disperse, according the ordinance.

Related Topics: Cleveland Heights City Council, Coventry Street Arts Fair, and Curfew
What do you think about the amendments to the new 6 p.m. curfew ordinance? Tell us in the comments.

Steve

8:27 am on Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Did anyone proof this article for grammar or context?
1. "The note will also have to include a home address, phone number and specify when, where and in what member the minor will be."
In what MEMBER? I can't even tell what you were trying to say there.

2. "but even as they passed it council members knew it would need tweaked."
Did you mean tweaking? Or, perhaps you meant "need to be tweaked."
To be or not to be...

Reply

Michelle Simakis

9:41 am on Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Thanks for your message, Steve, and I apologize for any confusion. To answer your first question, he meant "manner." We do proof articles. We do our best to avoid these types of errors, and when we do make a mistake, we make sure to correct it immediately. Thanks for reading and asking those questions.

Reply

Anastasia Pantsios

9:27 pm on Wednesday, July 6, 2011

I agree with Kathy and the kids. This "solution" attacks something that hasn't been a problem while not addressing the actual problem at all. It seems like it's being done just to make it look like the city is taking action, similar to the absurd inspections at airports that are supposed to make you feel more "safe," but are really nothing but theater. This feels like theater to me — and like the invasive inspections that have made flying so unpleasant, I think it diminishes the energy and excitement of the community. Meanwhile, the kids that congregated and got into fights at street fair will just stage their "flash mob" at 5 p.m. Problem NOT solved.

Reply

JF

4:43 pm on Tuesday, July 12, 2011

I was at the Coventry Street Fair, and while I certainly noticed the kids goofing off and causing a scene, I found it far more disagreeable to witness the cops sweeping the area and threatening arrest for being on the street. I don't want to see our society headed in this direction, much less do I want to see fascism take root in a place as cool as Coventry/Cleveland Heights ... USED to be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RT

11:21 pm on Monday, July 18, 2011

Well lets see how you feel in a couple years when these hoodlums grow into murders and theives- reality shows that most hoods don't grow into law abiding citizens even when they win record deals or athletic scholarships.

JF

4:46 pm on Tuesday, July 12, 2011

What I'm taking away from this article is, kids can be arrested for being on the street during normal business hours, usually before dinner - unless they present papers and prove that they have "legitimate business" for walking freely in a public thoroughfare. It also seems that youthful adults must carry ID at all times to prove their age. This kind of makes me feel sick.

Reply

RT

11:25 pm on Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Oh, Don't worry, you can still parade up and down Euclid heights blvd all night long- swearing and yelling- the kids are still have free reign..

Reply

Anne Caruso

6:44 am on Monday, July 18, 2011

I, too, am alarmed at the slegdehammer approach Cleveland Hts has taken. We already have laws against public disturbance, fighting, etc. Perhaps a plan that would address the areas needing more police atttention would have been a first step. it's unfair to our young people to expect them to be housebound from 6:00PM on. As usual, there are a vocal minority who cause trouble and they are the ones who should receive punishment, not everyone. It's not the easiest approach but it's the approach that is most just.

Reply

Donald R. Thompson

12:38 pm on Monday, July 18, 2011

How about making ANY flash mob over 25 participants in a business district illegal unless of course you get a permit.

Reply

RT

11:16 pm on Monday, July 18, 2011

LOL- How much power do you think the Cleveland Heights City has- lets see how well they enforce the curfew before we start taking away the freedoms guaranteed under the constitution.

Reply

Leave a comment