Infeld: Closing Gearity Will 'Kill Our City'
The proposal to close Gearity Professional Development School was a primary topic during a Monday meeting that included city and school officials from Cleveland Heights, University Heights and South Euclid.
University Heights Mayor Susan Infeld told the Cleveland Heights-University Heights School Board that if they decide to close Gearity Professional Development School, it will “kill our city.”
“Frankly, it’s odd in an urban area to not have a public elementary school,” Infeld said at a meeting Monday that included about 20 officials from Cleveland Heights, University Heights and South Euclid city councils and the CH-UH School Board. “In an area that is urban with sidewalks, it is normal and kind to have an elementary school choice for your children.”
The meeting was called to discuss the district’s third facilities master plan proposal, and the two most hotly debated topics — closing the only elementary school in University Heights, and what to do with the vacant Millikin School.
Plan C, the third idea developed by a team of architects working to renovate and modernize the buildings, calls for renovating Oxford, Canterbury and Roxboro elementary schools, Monticello, Wiley and Roxboro middle schools and demolishing and rebuilding Boulevard Elementary School.
The current elementary schools would serve pre-kindergarten through third grade and the middle schools would house fourth through eighth grades. The high school would also be renovated. All but the historic core, field and pool of the high school would be removed, and new wings would be added.
Classrooms would be much larger, divided by glass partitions and garage-door style doorways to create a variety of large and small group spaces. Hallways and other unused corners would become learning centers. The schools' outdated heating and cooling systems would be replaced, and energy-efficient lighting would be installed.
Gearity, Fairfax and Noble elementary schools would close and be repurposed for community use and potentially house after-school care and activities, health care facilities and a variety of other programs.
Karen Jones, school board president, said nothing is “etched in stone” yet.
“Closures of school buildings are never easy,” said Jones, who is a University Heights resident and attended the now closed Millikin School. “If we were no longer listening, if it was set to be done, then this meeting would not be taking place.”
University Heights Councilwoman Frankie Goldberg said though she was “thrilled” the meeting was scheduled, it was “long overdue.” She called Gearity a “crown jewel” of the city. Plans A or B would have closed Gearity as well but maintained a PK-8 or K-8 program at the Wiley campus, thus keeping an elementary program in the city.
School Board member Nancy Peppler said a large portion of the community rejected ideas A and B as they called for closing several more schools, which is why architects went back to the drawing board and came up with C.
“...The elected members of this board did not sit around and make those decisions about what was going to be presented to this community as options. We left that to the professionals. We asked the architects and the administration and these group of people to come forward after they heard from the citizens review committee about what this community said that it wanted,” Peppler said. “…They came forward with two options, and this community said absolutely not to option A … and really not to option B.”
Cleveland Heights City Councilwoman Mary Dunbar also gave the team of architects kudos for applying the community's wishes to the latest design idea.
Jones read a portion of the factsheet distributed by the district about Plan C that includes the reasons for closing Gearity, Noble and Fairfax, which include student population in the area, cost of renovating the buildings and the size of the properties.
Infeld said without a public elementary school in the city, parents with children will not choose to live there.
“We know from conversations with realtors and abstracts from academic research that if we cannot have a public elementary school, parents with children will not want to move to University Heights,” she said.
Infeld added that because the population in University Heights represents 25 percent of the populations of both cities combined, it’s only fair that the city get a quarter of the elementary schools.
“To pay taxes and not have any public elementary school in our city is wrong … We deserve and want and demand a public elementary school,” Infeld said. “Plan C is not the right plan. We need to talk about Plan D … this is the wrong plan.”
Cleveland Heights Vice Mayor Dennis Wilcox served on the citizens facilities committee that included more than 50 community members. They studied the condition of the school buildings after the Ohio Schools Facilities Commission said the facilities were “unsatisfactory” or “need improvement.” The commission found that because enrollment has dropped, the district has too much space and not enough students.
Wilcox said he understands why the district needs to reduce its space from 1.3 million square feet to about 900,000, but a Cleveland Heights school cannot be a substitute to save Gearity.
“Cleveland Heights is the last city that had an elementary school close — Coventry. And I know it’s a hard decision for a community or a school board to have to make … and this plan, Plan C, proposes two more Cleveland Heights schools to be closed. So Cleveland Heights has seen a big effect on this plan as well,” Wilcox said. “…I don’t think closing another elementary school in Cleveland Heights should even be close to any topic of discussion.”
Peppler said it was "heartbreaking" that the primary benefit of repurposing the schools — creating centers for the community — was getting lost in the conversation.
Cleveland Heights City Councilwoman Cheryl Stephens said it all boils down to customer service, and the school board should consider the councils their customers. And many are not satisfied with the facilities plan product.
"Those of us who support great public education, which you have managed to continue to supply, which is one of the reasons that the entire Cleveland Heights City Council endorsed your levy last year is because some things you figure out to do really well," Stephens said. "And we implore you to figure out how to do this well, too, so we can support you in your next levy."
Jodi Sourini
7:50 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Larger classrooms divided by glass partitions and garage-door style doorways? Does anyone really believe these will improve our children's education? Sounds like another fad designed to line the architects' pockets (they are paid a percentage based on total project cost) at the taxpayer's expense.
Garry Kanter
10:40 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
"University Heights Mayor Susan Infeld told the Cleveland Heights-University Heights School Board that if they decide to close Gearity Professional Development School, it will “kill our city.”"
Don't worry, Mayor. That brand spankin' new WalMart in SE, just 1/8 mile down the street, will kill your city *long* before your city's housing changes over enough hands for the SD to kill it.
This is what "ME! ME! ME! and the heck with the other guy" gets you when you don't think regionally.
Forgive me if I shed no tears.
John H.
9:40 am on Friday, May 18, 2012
I have to agree that a lack of regionalism is destroying our communities and, in fact, Cuyahoga County.
Infled sounds like she would throw South Euclid & Cleveland Heights under the bus for UH, and what people need to understand is that if one of those communities does poorly- all of them will suffer. University Heights is not alone on an island.
And Wilcox, while possibly being blunt, was trying to point out exactly where Infeld was leading people: The District is not going to keep Gearity & Canterbury both open.
Jodi Sourini
2:13 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
John H., If one community goes down, all will suffer! That's exactly the point Infeld was trying to make. Under this plan, CH keeps 4 elementary schools and UH has none! South Euclid under the SEL School District has 2 because when they downsized a few years ago, they made sure SE kept 2 and Lyndhurst kept 2. Under this plan, UH will be decimated and every surrounding city will be affected by that decay.
John H.
9:45 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
Jodi, the point I was trying to make is that Infeld doesn't seem to care that that her protestations are self serving, and detrimental to the whole. The school board looks at the schools and the district as a whole, and how things affect every student in it. Infeld doesn't see that larger picture.
But you make a good point- University Heights' success directly affects Cleveland Heights and South Euclid. And vis versa.
However, your comparison of CHUH to SEL is inaccurate. When the SEL went to close schools, it did the same way as CHUH- they kept open the ones where there were students who wanted to attend public schools. In just so happens that in SEL, it's more evenly distributed than CHUH.
Jodi Sourini
1:59 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
John H., SEL did select schools based on student density, but only after the joint boards (BOE and city governments) had already decided that both cities would keep at least one elementary school. I was personally told this by a Lyndhurst City Councilman who was part of the process. Incidentally, I was also told that the SEL BOE worked very closely with both city governments throughout the process.
Michelle Simakis
10:13 am on Friday, May 18, 2012
A comment has been removed because it violated our terms of service. Please review here: www.clevelandheights.patch.com/terms
C. Minot
11:10 am on Friday, May 18, 2012
Where is the money for this downsizing coming from??? This is why people are leaving Cleveland Heights and University Heights. I love the Heights but am afraid that I can't afford to live here anymore. Wasn't it just a year ago the Board was broke? If renovation made better students why hasn't anything changed in East Cleveland where in the past 8 years they have built a new junior and senior high school? I wish everybody would wake up and realize this is 2012 and not 1995.
Eric Silverman
4:07 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
What I find amusing and ironic is that the most vocal voices coming from UH leadership over the closing of Gearity are they themselves examples of those who move to UH with little to no intention of using the public schools. After 20 years of either ignoring the public schools or vilifying them, I fear this protestation may be little more than political cover, an easy excuse to not support an effort to improve our public school facilities for the next forty years.
Christine Dolan
10:35 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
So if University Heights voices don't matter because of the percentage of people using the public schools (my understanding is 20-25% of the district), would you support UH separating from the district? I am not in leadership in University Heights, but I certainly moved here with the expectation of using the public school system. I will say there are other ways to improve our public school facilities than spending > 200 million dollars with a 38 year bond to do a questionable design plan with movable walls and big open spaces. Oh, and without removing the only elementary school in University Heights.
Bill Mangano
4:21 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
I applaud Mayor Infeld for her courage and her advocacy. I am proud we have chosen a Mayor who stands up for us and does not let Heuer and the School Board bully her. Regionalism is a great idea, but it starts with communication and demands collaboration. Let's not forget that Heuer and the Board rolled out their plans without EVER speaking with Mayor Infeld. This was clearly intentional and showed absolutely no respect for her or her office. Thank you Mayor Infeld.
Scott Wachter
7:05 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
One must remember that UH has shown absolutely no regard to the public schools. Mayor Infeld herself while a council rep came out against school levies. UH going away will not hurt the region, actually it may be better. If UH merged with CH, it could bring back sorely missing federal dollars. Let's look at it another way. UH uses the SH court system and ice rink, it uses SE recreation dept, and the CH schools. What does UH bring to the table? As far as I can tell nothing but dead weight.
Christine Dolan
10:18 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
Hi. I am not sure I understand what you are saying. And I also didn't realize that University Heights residents that send their kids to public schools (approximately 20-25% of the district) were using Cleveland Heights schools. Thanks for that clarification. I don't consider myself or my family dead weight, but it is good to understand that that thought is out there. Are you saying that you think it would be good if University Heights was no longer a city? Or that it would be ok with you if University Heights separated from the CHUH school district?
Bill Mangano
11:15 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012
Mr. Wachter:
My children have been enrolled in the public schools since pre-K. We are very committed to public schools and are fighting to ensure there is an elementary public school option in University Heights for UH families in the future. We, along with many other families, have supported the public school system and will continue to do so. Your comments are offensive, short-sighted, and frankly, have no basis in fact.
With respect to Infeld, she supported the last school levy. In fact, her position has remained consistent. At that time she said, "it’s important to support the CH-UH schools because “the quality of the public school system has a direct impact on the quality of life and home values in our community.” http://www.cleveland.com/university-heights/index.ssf/2011/09/university_heights_mayor_suppo.html
Glinda Smith
12:32 pm on Sunday, May 20, 2012
UH contributes a lot of tax dollars to the school district, that's what it contributes. While I have always decried the lack of support of the CHUH public schools that University Heights has exhibited as long as I can remember, we do need their tax money. In that regard could Wiley be a K-8 school with a separate wing for the K-3 grades?
John H.
9:59 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
Infeld should try telling the district what she wants to happen, instead of what she doesn't want to happen. Does she want the district to close Cantabury instead? Turn Wiley into a K-8 school? She has the right to not like the plan, but she should counter proposal, or at least take the opportunity to tell the school board what she thinks her residents would like to see.
C. Minot
10:37 am on Saturday, May 19, 2012
Why is everybody ok with any of this. Why are we debating closing Gearity when the real subject that should be debated is why we feel we need to go in debt for 38 years to do something that ultimately changes nothing. This is a dream brought on by sending our school representatives to conferences that promote total physical restructuring of buildings. The only ones who will be enriched by this are architects and construction companies. Leave Gearity alone. Sale Milliken. Hire the best teachers you can. Don't shorten days or the school year. Making a better student is about working with that student, not putting that student in to a confusing world of moving walls and whatnot. Fellow residents of UH and CH.- don't let them steal the system away from us.
Claire Robinson May
2:37 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
I agree, it's not about the building, it's about what goes on inside. A good teacher with the freedom to have a creative non-standardized-test-based curriculum and high expectations for the students can teach just about anywhere. (Well, walls do help, but as we know, they're not essential.)
Garry Kanter
8:18 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
I hear the UH mayor tightened the city's policy regarding jet travel.
You know, the Infeld Fly Rule.
Elizabeth Heasley
10:50 am on Monday, May 21, 2012
My family will be leaving the CHUH district at the end of the school year and I can tell you the reason we’re leaving has nothing to do with the quality of the education or the condition of the school buildings. I grew up in Shaker and the CHUH buildings I have been in are every bit as nice and well maintained. The custodial staff, teachers and support staff do a tremendous job.
We tried private school and decided it wasn’t for us. We felt it didn’t contribute to the sense of community we longed for. After living in the same house for 9 years we didn’t know many neighbors and our children didn’t have friends in the immediate area. Our daughter entered CHUH and we enrolled our son in the preschool program. We found the community we were missing and were blown away by the programs offered before, during and after school.
The reason we are leaving has more to do with property value, low interest rates and the perfect time to buy up. We listed and sold our house within weeks of plan C being announced and I have to say it’s hard to second guess our decision to leave.
Elizabeth Heasley
10:51 am on Monday, May 21, 2012
Going to various kindergarten open houses in the district, I found it amusing the district has to sell itself, but that’s just what is has to do. There are so many private school options in the area; the school district has to make itself an attractive option.
My goal, as a parent, is to provide a stable learning environment with the fewest distractions. Moving gifted programs and changing educational themes, on what seems to be an annual basis, does nothing to attract and retain involved families. The district has a problem with fear, plain and simple. Families are scared to use the system and it’s a shame to realize plan C is just another distraction from what the true issue is.
C. Minot
8:39 pm on Saturday, May 26, 2012
The Board is looking to spend close to 300M to restructure the facilities. Why not take the 300M and hire teachers. Reduce all class sizes to 1 teacher and 5 or less students. That way they could use every building they currently have including Coventry, Millikin, Gearity and Taylor Rd. Academy. The kids would almost have the status of a private tutor. They won't have to lease or sale Millikin or close Gearity. This undoubtedly would result in better educated kids then disrupting the whole teaching process due to construction.
John Hubbard
10:38 am on Friday, July 13, 2012
Please consider signing this petition essentially asking the CH-UH Board of Ed to allow a year of honest community dialog before asking our community for $130 Million.
http://www.change.org/petitions/cleveland-heights-university-heights-board-of-education-remove-plan-c-from-consideration-for-the-november-2012-ballot