patching...
Update: Have you found us on Facebook? "Like" our page to get Cleveland Heights news updates throughout the day! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Residents Voice Concerns About Plans for Oakwood at City Council Meeting

People squeezed into the Cleveland Heights City Council meeting room on Monday night to share ideas for property and oppose national retail and residential development

 

There were so many people at the Cleveland Heights City Council meeting Monday night to oppose plans from First Interstate Properties, Ltd., for the Oakwood Country Club land that some stood in the hallway or sat on the floor.

The commercial development company based in Lyndhurst has bought the South Euclid portion of the property, and if it does purchase the 92 acres in Cleveland Heights, it plans to convert the space into a mall with national retailers, residential properties and devote 69 acres to parkland.

Mitchell Schneider, president of First Interstate Properties, said the company is still early in the process with Cleveland Heights, and plans on scheduling formal meetings with the city soon. The goal is to purchase the Cleveland Heights side by the end of April, and begin construction this summer, according to a press release from the company.

Residents who spoke at the council meeting were outraged about the developer's plans. More than a dozen people approached the lectern to address council, most suggesting that the land be completely preserved for a park.

"I'm so concerned about the idea of having more big-box stores and more retail where Oakwood is now," said Lisa Rainsong. "If we can do something with Oakwood such as a park, that would help establish once again that this is really a different community,  there's something special about Cleveland Heights that differentiates us from other communities where development is going to happen."

Others hoped the space would include a dog park and local businesses instead of national chains.

"First of all, we have a new director of economic development (Howard Thompson.) He is dynamic, energized … this is a prime opportunity to develop some local businesses," said Marcie Denton. 

The crowd, of what some estimated to be about 50 - 75 people, erupted from time to time, cheering and clapping in support of comments. 

The land is currently zoned for residential property, and it would have to be rezoned to implement First Interstate's plans. Rezoning is a long process that would include public meetings, said Law Director John Gibbon, as he explained the various steps. 

Gibbon said people were free to address council that night and at any other time about Oakwood, he said without the proposal and specifics about the developer's plans, council members could not comment.

Mayor Ed Kelley thanked residents for their comments, and reiterated Gibbon's statements. 

"This is just the beginning of what will be a very, very, very long process."

After hearing from residents for a little more than an hour and asking if there was anyone else who wanted to speak, the council meeting continued. As people got up to leave, someone shouted, "Good job, everyone," and the crowd could be heard outside of the meeting room doors for about 20 minutes. 

Related Topics: Citizens for Oakwood, Cleveland Heights City Council, and Oakwood Country Club
What do you think should happen to the Oakwood Country Club property? Tell us in the comments.

Marty G

1:39 pm on Tuesday, January 4, 2011

The Oakwood question. There are some ideas floating around, but the difference between a good idea and great idea will be the aftermath. The retail nirvana proposed by First Interstate would be a disaster for the communtiy. You currently see vacancy signs on Coventry as well as the last great retail idea Serverence. The Interstate idea is a contiuation of a locust like build and leave behind mentality. The Oakwood question can only be addressed by first and foremost putting forth real solutions for the current retail areas (Conventry and Severence). It (Oakwood) is not a stand alone question, but the answer will define us and our community. With that said the best fit would not involve a retail or housing answer, sounds like the real debate should start with a conversatation about the value of a great new park and the need for modern business district. A great new park would fit nicely. It would provide a great view of retail housing debacle unfolding in South Euclid. Yet, creating an office megaplex with light manufacturing that could rival Beta drive would bring much needed revenue and real job growth to the city. Tax questions and the like will follow but that should be the start of a great debate.

Reply

B McNamara

12:01 pm on Friday, January 7, 2011

There is no need for additional retail or new housing in Cleveland Heights. The only ones to benefit from the proposed development are the developers.

Reply

Joe Liptow

8:51 pm on Tuesday, March 15, 2011

"This is just the beginning of what will be a very, very, very long process." -Said Kelly in CH.

"This is just the beginning of what will be a very, very, very long process." -Said Miller in SE.

Is there an echo in here?

B McNamara,
I think there are some other major benefactors who want the green and I'm not refering to the color GR$$N either. Happy St. Patricks Day to all!

Reply

Leave a comment