The CH-UH Board Of Education and the Lay Facilities Committee's alleged efforts to engage the community leave me quite underwhelmed.
I've watched some meetings on video, I've attended a couple of meetings, and I've done my best to otherwise learn about the proposed levy.
Now, all I need is someone to talk to about this.
I'll start the conversation...
Did you know there's most likely two levies, in back-to-back years?
According to the January 9th LFC meeting, which is on video at the BOE's website, you can expect a Capitol Bond Levy in 2013, followed immediately by an Operating Funds Levy in 2014.
And it's pretty well understood that the 6 mils they will ask for on the Capital Bond Levy isn't nearly enough for the whole decade-long facilities initiative. They really need at least 10 mils to do it all.
Start watching (listening) around the 11:30-ish and 37 minute marks, each for about 5 minutes. It's worth your time.
http://www.chuh.org/multimedia/videos (top right, Lay Facilities Meeting - January 9, 2013)
Garry Kanter
3:12 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
Let's talk.
michaelschwartz
7:51 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
The arrogance of that Moultrop lady is disgusting. People like her are responsible for the decline of this once proud suburb. Her and that Deanne Bremer Fisher nut who just want to be "inclusive" and dialogue and gush about diversity. This city is on the ropes. Face facts Garry: The schools were lost years ago and are now only populated by minorities fleeing East Cleveland and a few liberal losers who subject their kids to it. They should be brought before Children and Family Services for neglect. And that is a fact.
Garry Kanter
8:45 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
We only lose any battle if we quit.
UH Resident
5:06 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
This "schwartz" character quit years ago. Now all he does is troll various local message boards spouting nonsense opinions (and claiming these to be facts). I wouldn't even bother trying to engage him in conversation, Garry, he has no intention of doing anything productive.
Garry Kanter
4:47 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
I recognize that. I wouldn't describe my responses as "engaging him".
michaelschwartz
8:59 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
Garry, I really admire your chutzpah in trying to deal with these losers at the Lay Finance commitee and the incompetents on the School Board and City Council but they are so incestuous and connected that they suffer from groupthink in that they are unable/unwilling to even acknowledge that there is anything wrong with the city and its schools. The rest of the metro area is either horrified or just laughs out loud at the this city and schools. And you know what? Their right. There will be no meaningful change until they are all voted out, which will never happen in time to save Cleveland Heights. And that is a true shame.
Garry Kanter
10:35 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
Five city council members are up for election in November, 2013.
Since they are all "at large", an incumbent has to finish 6th to *not* be elected. Fifth is as good as first, sadly.
Well, somehow, we gotta get it done.
UH Resident
5:11 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
So "schwartz," for all of the whining and complaining that you do, when was the last time you attended any local government meeting of any kind?
Garry Kanter
10:52 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
Here's something I developed and posted at the "official" Facilities Levy forum:
------------
Sam Bell was gracious enough to spend a good amount of time yesterday afternoon bringing me up to speed on Boulevard - the physical building's limitations, and where I might find existing documentation.
What I thought I heard last year was this:
● "Boulevard Elementary has to be torn down. From a practical standpoint, the building has too many problems to fix, primarily caused by it being designed for (the fad of) "Open Classrooms".
● "Boulevard will then be rebuilt as an Elementary, centered around the concept of (the fad of) "Learning Communities".
What I concluded (right or wrong) was, "They're repeating the exact same mistake. And they want $16 MILLION to do it? Good grief! What other obvious mistakes are looming in the rest of the $205 MILLION they want to spend?"
What I learned from Sam yesterday was:
Unlike "Open Classrooms", "Learning Communities are *designed* to accommodate multiple configurations of classrooms. That is, to begin with - unlike the execution of CH-UH's Open Classrooms in the 1970s - it is understood that "one size does *not* fit all".
continued...
Garry Kanter
10:52 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
...continued
So, while they may both be fads, the Learning Communities concept does not tie the current or future administrations into any single educational paradigm, or require "unnatural" modifications to use differently over time. Conceivable, the community could be configured semi-permanently closely to "traditional" classrooms.
In my opinion, then:
● *This* is the kind of information that was not available to people like me.
● Simple explanations like the above would engender greater buy-in from the community at large.
I suppose other citizens had different "hot points". In sales, if you can get the customer to *tell* you why they won't make the purchase today, that gives you a chance to address - and eliminate their discomfort (in our case, hopefully with meaningful data). And make the sale. Which is what this LFC exercise is really all about:
Informing/demonstrating to the electorate that the facilities initiative has been well thought out, and deserves their "Yes" vote in November.
Posted Jan 17, 2013
http://theciviccommons.com/conversations/ch-uh-school-facilities
Garry Kanter
10:55 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013
But here's the rub, also posted at the official forum. The plan is to remodel/rebuild Heights High, then the middle schools, and finally the elementary schools.
That means the unfit Boulevard and Fairfax will have another decade's worth of kids.
No. If Boulevard is that bad, make it right for the kids, asap. Not 10 years from now.
---------
I'm watching the January 9th LFC meeting video on the district's website.
If Boulevard is such a horrible building, as described above, would the students benefit if that remodel/rebuild project was moved to the beginning, rather than the end of the initiative?
I guess the question applies equally to the other footprint elementary, which is Fairfax, I believe.
Posted Jan 17, 2013
http://theciviccommons.com/conversations/ch-uh-school-facilities
Ralph Solonitz
6:43 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
My applause to both Michael and Garry. Stoopid starts with the Cleveland Heights School Board.
Ralph Solonitz
6:45 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
And possibly the Cleveland Heights City Council.
Garry Kanter
8:23 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
And the "Community Outreach" report included this startling and dispiriting info:
They've spent until now creating a survey. Which was still not "final" (The roster of the LFC was announced on October 2, 2012. That's 3 1/2 months. See the link way at the bottom.)
But wait, here's what the survey was developed for:
The first two "open ended questions" will:
"...Open up a realm of ideas that possibly will be used during the campaign phase, in terms of what people value about our schools, and why strong schools are important to them."
The remaining questions(s) are about priorities and willingness top spend tax $ on these priorities.
"Community Outreach". A 27 member committee created mainly to inform and engage the voters. And what they come up with for "Community Outreach" is: Levy campaign tactics.
After 3 1/2 months. And the final report to the BOE will be at the end of May.
This head-spinning report begins at about the 1 hour 12 minute mark of this link:
http://www.chuh.org/multimedia/videos click on the "Lay Facilities Meeting - January 9, 2013" video.
Here's the link announcing the membership of the committee on October 2, 2012. Some members of the community saw problems right away:
http://clevelandheights.patch.com/articles/lay-facilities-committee-expected-to-be-introduced-at-ch-uh-board-meeting
Garry Kanter
9:14 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
This is how Boulevard is described at the official forum:
-------
Deanna Bremer Fisher
I would recommend you also take a tour of either Boulevard or Fairfax to see firsthand how the buildings function. I was very glad that Krissy Dietrich-Gallagher and Dallas Schubert gave us a tour of Fairfax after our LFC meeting at that building. It was real eye-opener.
I had been in the footprint buildings on numerous occasions for meetings, but had never actually seen the entire space. Classrooms do not have walls or doors. There is little storage space for teachers or students. Most of the classrooms don't have windows. The entire school cannot assemble in the cafeteria/auditorium so they have to use the gym for that purpose. The gym is separated from the cafeteria/auditorium by a flimsy sliding partion, which means that the noise level must be incredibly loud. A ramp in the middle of the building takes up a huge amount of square footage. The building was constructed with low-quality materials.
In summary, my impression of the building was that it is energy-inefficient, ugly, noisy and depressing. It is a tragedy that we have been trying to educate our kids in those buildings for the last 40 years.
We should examine the costs of rennovating, rather than rebuilding, Boulevard, but we'd also need to have an architect show us how/if the building could be redesigned to fix its flaws.
continued...
Garry Kanter
9:16 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
...continued...
Likewise, the 1970s additions to the historic school buildings are so poor that a comprehensive plan that does not include removing them--such as Plan C-- is a non-starter.
Posted Jan 16, 2013
http://theciviccommons.com/conversations/ch-uh-school-facilities#node-12088
Garry Kanter
9:33 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
And...
Krissy Dietrich Gallagher
Thank you for saying this, Deanna. One other point to make is that the footprint buildings were intended to last 30 years and have now existed for almost 40. They are, simply put, not conducive to teaching or learning. Our students and teachers certainly do their best, but high quality elementary classrooms are not quiet spaces. Students, especially the very young, should be having conversations, singing, chanting, ... all sorts of things that would be considered disruptive in a space without walls.
Not to mention the heating and cooling issues that plague these buildings where kids in one room need to open the windows (in there are any!) in the middle of winter and in another corner, they're bundled up in sweaters.
Boulevard sits on a very large piece of property that is centrally located, making it accessible by foot, bike or bus for many students. The building, however, is inefficient, loud, ugly, expensive to maintain and so on. Tearing it down and rebuilding on that site is the most sensible thing to do.
And it should be noted that the LFC is currently trying to craft a plan that will fall well below the $200 million price tag.
Posted Jan 17, 2013
Garry Kanter
9:26 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
That is the kind of inconsistent, poorly thought out "analysis" that I've been trying to correct.
If Boulevard is *that* bad - and Fairfax is presumably just as bad (and it's why Coventry and Taylor are no longer elems) - then replacing Boulevard, and moving kids out of Fairfax, *must* be the *first* priority. Not the last!
As far as I can tell, Fairfax Elem is a goner. But not until *after* the HS and middle schools.
So, another 10 years until we get the kids out of those two supposedly unfit buildings. Nice, eh?
But these guys on the committee aren't interested in data gathering and logic. Frankly, I don't understand their motivations.
But I will not placate them.
michaelschwartz
11:05 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
The absolutely most disturbing thng about this fiasco is the COST and everyone on the Lay Finance Commitee and City Council blatant ignoring of the potentially CRIPPLING effect on homeowners should a levy in the amount of some $205 million will do to the city. If you think Cleveland Heights is on the ropes now, just wait until this levy passes and homeowners are facing an unprecedented increase in their property taxes. You will see an exodus and panic selling the likes which have never before seen. There really needs to be an organized opposition to any school levy formed early as the Board and their toadies will have overly paid pr flaks and the like spouting off feel good talking points and flyers to confuse residents and bullet points like " it will only cost you an extra $75/month or so" rubbish.
Garry Kanter
11:21 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
I disagree about "most disturbing".
It's *all* disturbing. The lack of effort by the committee. The lack of leadership on the committee. The lack of any new information gathered by the committee.
The outcome of whatever unquestionably ill-conceived plan they come up with will be disturbing.
The waste of $206 MILLION, 10 years, and thousands of students being under-served is disturbing.
And the multi-headed, mendacious cabal that enshrines the whole group/process has already long ago gotten on my last nerve.
UH Resident
5:18 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
So are you going to work to form the organization to oppose the levy? Doubtful.
FYI the bond issue will be partially funded by the state, likely won't be anywhere near that $205 million number you're quoting, and will be spread out over several decades. Many of these schools need maintenance either way and that's going to cost tens of millions of dollars.
Garry Kanter
5:30 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
I wouldn't attempt to form such a committee.
I just look for relevant information, and share it. I don't make statements like you just did about the $200 million, and decades, and whatever. They mean nothing.
The facts alone will cause that levy to fail and/or BOE members to not get re-elected.
Which is a shame, because the students of the district deserve proper buildings. And proper decision makers.
Garry Kanter
6:50 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013
"...Likely won't be anywhere near that $205 million number you're quoting, and will be spread out over several decades. " - UH Resident
It doesn't matter what the final $ figure is, it will be a *lot*.
Sooo... Boulevard and Fairfax are so horrible that Boulevard has to be torn down and rebuilt - just to stay as an elementary. And Fairfax isn't likely to be in any of the scenarios proposed.
But you say the project will take "decades". And the LFC wants to do the HS first, then the middle schools, and only *then* address the elementaries.
So more kids will have to attend that crappy Boulevard and Fairfax for "decades"? How does that make any sense?
The BOE, the admin, and the LFC simply do not know how to gather data, analyze it, and make logical, hopefully "optimal" decisions.
They show this repeatedly with this initiative, and they've shown it with the Lee-Meadowbrook rubber-stamping of the Treasurer's recommendation, and I'll bet it was the same thing that caused that brand new principal to wash out so amazingly fast.
The kids deserve decent school buildings. We all deserve decent leadership from the BOE and the admin.
UH Resident
10:31 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Garry, I don't believe the construction will take decades (is my post worded in a manner that implies this?). What will take decades is the payment of the bonds.
As for Boulevard, from what I've been reading, it seems as though there is a good chance it will not remain as an elementary school. Either way, if we do Boulevard early in the process and then Heights later in the process, some kids will be in "swing spaces" for significant periods of time twice during their PK-12 school careers, and I think that is something we need to try to avoid. If we start with Heights and work our way down, no student will have more than one disruption.
Garry Kanter
11:29 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Thank you for the clarification. In meetings, "decade" is the time frame.
There are many timelines that avoid what you describe, for example: Elem, HS, MS
But the state of the buildings, cost of limping along, and affect on education seem to all be missing from the discussion. As are a great many things.
Nathaniel Brooks
2:40 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013
The lay facilities plan is a joke. I went to one of the meetings and I was appalled by the incompetence of our elected officials. First off, I want to address the point Schwartz made about people fleeing East Cleveland and coming to the Heights. Who's greedy decision was it to let section 8 in? That's where the blame needs to be placed. These land lords don't care what people are doing out of their properties as long as they get their money. The land lord lives somewhere in Chagrin Falls and collects his money monthly. He bought property in Cleveland Heights, but could care less what happens here, as long as he gets his money. If you don't have to work to live where you want there is no incentive to act accordingly lol. I hope that makes sense. I can't stand section 8 in my city. Ten years ago it wasn't as bad as it is now. We need to pass an initiative to kick section 8 out. I don't know how this can be done, but it should be top priority. They had their chance and blew it . The current school system is in shambles, mostly because of section 8, but also incompetent city officials. Spending 200 million plus dollars for some shiny building will do nothing to improve performance. The desire to learn comes from within. If this thing goes to a vote we must do everything in our power to vote it down. Look at east Cleveland they have shiny new school buildings and performance is unsatisfactory at best. It's not the building, it's the people in it.
Nathaniel Brooks
2:50 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013
Cleveland Heights pays some of the highest taxes in the state, not just county, the state. Solon, Beechwood, and Orange all pay lower taxes than us and their schools make our schools look as if they are for the mentally retarded. I don't mean to offend anyone, but you know it's the truth. Chagrin Falls does have section 8, but when they drew up the district lines for the school they cut around it lol look it up. Now why would they go and do a thing like that? I know cause they weren't willing to let the irresponsible destroy their school system that's why. Any homeowner who still lives here needs to take their head from their rectum and pay attention. If you want to ever have a chance of selling your house for what it was appraised for say in 2003 you better start cleaning house and you better do it now. I'm done I doubt anyone is listening.
UH Resident
5:32 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Solon, Beachwood, and Orange have two things that CH-UH does not: 1) A critical mass of wealthy and educated residents that are invested in the local school district, and 2) a plethora of industry which leads to significant property tax dollars. These are inherent advantages that CH-UH does not have and there's very little that the BOE can do to change that.
As for that anecdote about Chagrin Falls, although it would be encouraging if it were truth, the fact is that school district boundaries in Northeast Ohio were drawn long before Section 8 even came into existence.
John H.
2:26 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
About Chagrin Falls.......there is a "poor area' of Chagrin Falls called Chagrin Falls Park. It was, when founded, a place where the servants of wealthier Chagrin families lived. Chagrin Schools did draw the lines kicking them out -that neighborhood is in the Kenston School District. That was 100 years ago, and Kenston Schools (Bainbridge & Auburn Twps.) are now arguably just as good as Chagrin schools. But Section 8 was created after the redrawing.
Also, a good portion of Solon is industry, and of course, the Nestle/Stouffers campus is a growing part of that industry. Solon taxes them and those taxes help pay for the Schools in Solon, an advantage that CH-UH doesn't have.
michaelschwartz
3:14 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013
Nathaniel, I am listening. You are right on all counts. Section 8 has effectively finished this city and from what I can tell nothing can be done about it. All any responsible citizen can do is alert their neighbors to the pending school tax levy disaster and encourage everyone you know to vote NO.
Garry Kanter
8:24 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013
Can we stay on topic, please?
Richard Hollis
7:51 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013
My four daughters all went through the CH-UH School System, starting with Fairfax, and they all turned out okay. Fairfax was a terrible building when it was built, but that, I feel does not have a whole lot to do with the quality of education. The teachers have to spend a lot of their time on things that should have been learned at home - basic reading (Good NIght Moon), manners, and discipline. You can build all the fancy buildings you want, but $200,000 will not make the parents any better. There are many who feel that it is the school's problem, not theirs.
Richard Hollis
4:01 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Sorry, $200,000,000.
Nathaniel Brooks
9:04 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
UH resident believe what you want, but that doesn't make it true. I don't know what critical mass of wealthy well educated individuals you are talking about, but I've never met any. Paying a mortgage is not the same thing as owning your home at least to me it's not. I guess people have their own definition for the word own. One might think that because you have money, or live in a nice suburb that it equates to intelligence, well it doesn't. A lot of the money floating around North East Ohio is Old money with a capital O lol. You didn't build that your great grand dad did lol.
UH Resident
12:10 am on Monday, January 21, 2013
Are you debating the fact that the districts you've named as being "successful" also happen to be used by a great deal of high-income families and very few low-income families?
Nathaniel Brooks
9:06 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Or your great grand dad forced someone else to build it under the tyranny of bondage and then tried to take credit for it. Look at George H W Bush lots of money, prestige, still stuck on stupid. He stole the election with his daddy's help. I guess it goes to show you, it's not what you know, it's who you know. Orange and Beechwood are nice Solon on the other hand reminds me of a po dunk town. Moreland Hills makes Solon look like East Cleveland so let's keep things in perspective. If you have real money you move out to G Mills or in the West G area. Solon beechwood and Orange are faking it so to speak. I've been inside each of those schools and they aren't that impressive. University School makes them look like a shack. It really isn't fair to compare the two because one is private and one is public. The point I am making is that many people who are neighbors in Beechwood, Solon and Orange choose to send their children wherever they want. So the statement about being invested in the school is somewhat skewed.
Nathaniel Brooks
9:07 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
I pay property tax in Cleveland Heights does that mean I'm invested in the school? If so I want my money back because I see no profit from it. For the most part public schools are for the middle class. People who can afford to send their children to private school, usually don't mind footing that bill. You mentioned a plethora of industry. What industry? Is there some steel mill out in Solon that I don't know about? Is there some GE manufacturing plant they recently put out in Orange? I don't consider the selling of consumer goods also known as retail to be an industry in the sense of the word's original meaning. America produces nothing except crappy people lol. When they originally drew the lines for the school district in Chagrin Falls the area that I stated was cut out for section 8 was previously inhabited prior to section 8 by low income people. Call it poor people, call it section 8, it's all the same to me. \When a majority has the opportunity to stick it to a minority they usually do. I'm just saying.
UH Resident
12:42 am on Monday, January 21, 2013
Lots of wealthy people use the public schools in those suburbs.
Take a drive down Aurora Road in Solon sometime. I'm not talking about retail because every suburb has retail. I'm talking about the office parks, of which the outer-ring suburbs have many and the Heights have almost none.
As for Chagrin Falls, at this point I'd love to see a source to back your claim.
michaelschwartz
9:34 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Nathaniel, UH resident is a fraud who hides behind a fake name and who apparently has duped Garry with her "facts" without links. On thread after thread he/she does nothing but attack those who would tell it like it is about the state of the city and its schools. I guess that is all you can do when the state of the city and schools speak for themselves--attack the messenger, but that is what one has come to expect from those who defend the disasterous status quo. I suspect the UH resident is either a public school teacher with a vested interest in high taxes
or just one of the few white lib losers still forcing his/her kids to attend the Heights schools. Any self respecting black or white family has either moved out to the suburbs which UH resident speaks so deridingly of above, or will do anything to pay tuition to a private school to give their kids a fighting chance. People like UH resident are those that are directly responsible for cleveland Heights decline from the suburb of choice to just another low income, rudderless inner ring suburb that in the next 5 years will look like East Cleveland, just like the PD article pointed out today about another suburb Garfield Heights and its high tax aura that people are high tailing out of.
Garry Kanter
10:29 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Your analysis/rant has a half dozen error and misunderstands, including the idea that I have been "duped" because I "get" your shtick.
UH Resident
12:50 am on Monday, January 21, 2013
There is no one by the name of "Michael Schwartz" owning property in the City of Cleveland Heights, which begs several questions about YOUR credibility.
And since you like links so much, here is one where anyone can verify this tidbit:
http://fiscalofficer.cuyahogacounty.us/AuditorApps/real-property/REPI/default.asp
As for the rest of your post, Garry's right, as usual it's full of errors and ridiculous hyperbole. You must really be mad.
michaelschwartz
3:07 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Garry you were duped. UH resident, as deranged as you are hiding behind your fake name, your link to the county auditor is meaningless. It provides no evidence that the State is going to pay for most of the cost of construction as you state above. So I guess in addtion to being a phony you are also a liar and should be ignored by any serious poster. If you are what represents the school supporting folks and the powers entrenched in city offices, we as a community are in a lot bigger trouble than even I could imagine.
Garry Kanter
3:11 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Welcome to the large club of people who claim to know what I think and do better than I, myself , know what I think and do.
You are all idiots.
UH Resident
5:08 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
"schwartz," try to keep up here. The reason I posted that link was to indicate to those reading this discussion that you are not who you claim to be. It's incredibly disingenuous for you to accuse me of something that you're also guilty of.
Once again, there is no one by the name of "Michael Schwartz" owning property in Cleveland Heights.
michaelschwartz
9:38 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
As a sidenote, I bet the sobering multitude of blue light security cameras up and down Lee road that were placed there as a result of numerous muggings and demanded by the merchants are rather not their for their stated purpose of detering the out of control crime, but are there as some form of public art that should be celebrated like the street graffiti artists who tag cars and buildings, huh UH resident?
UH Resident
12:11 am on Monday, January 21, 2013
If you say so.
Richard Hollis
5:27 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
It is not necessary to own peoperty in Cleveland Heights in order to have an opinion, express an opinion, or vote. One of the rules of Patch, however, even though it is not enforced, is to use your own name. Perhaps people might place more credence in what UH Resident has to say it he/she were to use his/her real name. I suppose it is possible that UH Resident is a real name.
UH Resident
7:37 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
michaelschwartz is not using his real name, either. Or, if he is, then he is not who he says he is (i.e. he's not a CH property owner, as he often claims to be). I make zero pretenses about who I am because UH Resident is clearly an alias. However michaelschwartz is a liar no matter how you slice it.
Richard Hollis
7:59 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
It could be that his property is in a relatives name, or a corporate name. Many do that for a multitude of reasons. How do we know from your alias that do not live in Butte, Montana? Follow the rules and use your real name. What are you ashamed of?
michaelschwartz
9:04 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Thanks Richard for your input. I feel no need to explain myself to Miss Misrepresention. After I outed her for trying to compare the Beachwood schools as a "peer" district of CHUH a few threads ago she has become increasingly bitter and hostile and is unable to post on the topic at hand ( in this case the upcoming school levy) and instead resorts to childish personal attacks and worthless links that have nothing to do with the topic. If he/she is representative of whats left of the Heights schools supporters, I think it speaks for itself and more than prove my points as outlined above. As for shame, I believe UH resident has alot to be ashamed of as evidenced by the immature posts and may be actually be a5th or 6th grader based upon the maturity level of the posts. That could be the reason for the fake name.
UH Resident
9:36 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Actually, Michelle (or is it Brandy?), your responses have been consistently ridiculous and off-base.
And that discussion about peer districts just shows that you lack basic reading comprehension skills, because I never said that Beachwood was a peer district. Never. Go back and quote what I said, instead paraphrasing in your own convoluted words like you always like to do. It was your MO on Cleveland.com when you called yourself "branddeis" (before being banned) and apparently you've brought that tactic here (along with your hyperbolic, sky is falling rhetoric that is completely out of touch with reality).
The most ironic and hilarious thing about this entire discussion is that everything you accuse me of being and doing, that is, being "bitter," "hostile," "immature," "childish," and engaging in personal attacks and using fake names, all of this could very easily be used to describe your posting style.
michaelschwartz
9:41 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Just a rhetorical question, UH resident, are you in the 5th or 6th grade?
UH Resident
7:39 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Wow now that was witty. It was almost as funny as the first time you made that comment.
Nikki Ferrell
10:08 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Hey guys! Thanks for commenting on Cleveland Heights Patch. Let's keep discussion here polite, meaningful and without personal attacks, ok?
We were talking about school bonds. And...go!
Richard Hollis
10:41 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
If people do not use their real names, one of the Patch rules, their comments should not be posted.
UH Resident
7:40 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Richard, would you prefer for me to create an account with a real-sounding name like "Michael" has done? Because that can be arranged.
michaelschwartz
10:22 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Thanks, Nikki. You are absolutely right. If posters cannot stay on topic and just resort to attacks, let alone using fake names, they should not be here.
UH Resident
7:41 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Irony at its finest.
Nikki Ferrell
10:52 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Hey guys - I know it might be confusing, but Patch updated their Terms of Use to "encourage, but not require" users to use their real names. You can read the update here: http://clevelandheights.patch.com/terms
But again, we're talking about school levies, right?
Garry Kanter
10:59 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Doing everything I can to talk about school levies.
Which reminds me, unless there is a weather cancellation, there is a buildings subcommittee meeting at 7:00 tonight at Coventry.
Richard Hollis
3:08 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
It gets to the point that posting anything on Patch because of those few who seem to feel that their opinion is the only opinion. When someone disagrees, the nasty snipes start.
Nathaniel Brooks
4:00 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Here is the point. Cleveland Heights school system is in shambles. Every freaking year these public officials from the BOE ask us for more and more money. In exchange for our hard earned dollars we are given an unsatisfactory result. How dare they ask the citizens for $200 million dollars. It is shameful to ask for $200 million dollars to fix external problems and then make the claim that it will also fix the internal problems. Let me tell you here and now it will not. They already tried this in East Cleveland and it did not work. We are still waiting on those perfect SAT scores to come out of East Cleveland. The desire to learn comes from within. Shiny buildings with garage doors, with walls and partitions that rotate is not going to improve algebra scores, or reading comprehension. If any money is to be spent it should be on teachers and not the inflated salaries of public officials. I think who ever did the study for the facilities proposal must have though we were fools. If you brought that crap proposal to Laurel or University school they would have laughed in your face and they could actually come up with the funding. Prove to the citizens that you can maintain a viable school system in our district with the money we already gave you. When you show me a high school with a 90% graduation rate, I'll show you a city that supports its schools. That is all.
UH Resident
7:46 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Nathaniel, while I don't disagree with you in theory, as Garry has pointed out, even with the current buildings, tens of millions of dollars in repairs are needed to keep them viable. Remember last year when Roxboro had serious issues that caused the cancellation of several days of school? Money is needed to fix some of the structural problems and if we act fast, some of it can come from the state.
Garry Kanter
7:54 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
The kids need buildings that don't hinder getting an education.
The problem is that this ongoing goat rodeo - of the BOE, the admin, the Lay Facilities Committee, and Reaching Heights - has done nothing to indicate they have a clue as to how to go about analyzing what those needs are, and how to efficiently deliver them.
They are wasting time and $, and getting nowhere, fast.