.
Feedback

Want a Baby? How Much Do You Like Your Father-in-Law?

After learning of your husband's infertility, would you carry a child that was biologically fathered by your father-in-law?

Here's a headline guaranteed to catch the eye:

DUTCH MAN SEEKS CHILD WITH FATHER’S SPERM

Except…the man may get the sperm, and the headlines, but it’s his wife who has the uterus.  I'm trying to imagine the stress and deep-thinking going on in her head. I have to imagine because she's not interviewed in the story.  Silly me. It's obviously all about the boys.

But, of course, it isn't.

How much of this mom-to-be's acceptance of this plan is based on pleasing her husband vs. her own desire for a child?  And, does she want to experience pregnancy so badly that she’s making a decision she might later regret? Certainly that would be the worst-case scenario, leading her to abuse the child with subtle or obvious attacks.

And, yes, Oprah introduced the world to a 61-year-old American woman who delivered her own grandchild.  But, that lady was implanted with an egg from her daughter’s womb that had been fertilized by her son-in-law.  

In this new story, the woman in The Netherlands — the one with the uterus — has apparently decided to carry a child whose “grandfather” is its biological father. Her husband will be her child’s biological half-brother.

 It’s not totally icky, but danged close.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Cleveland Heights Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Lisa Regula Meyer March 31, 2012 at 12:12 pm
Eh, it's just one more way to create a family, and with the restrictions in Holland being what they are, this seems to be a reasonable solution. They're going to have to be open with the child (or never let it near the internet), and openness by the family is a good indicator for the future support and ability to cope for the child; it's the kids whose parents hide their heritage that fare far worse.
Teresa K. March 31, 2012 at 12:56 pm
terrible writing..... I wont click this writer again.
re: "modern communication strategist".... how? the choppy writing and veering off blows me away.
Jack Kelly March 31, 2012 at 07:35 pm
And this "criticism" from someone who doesn't know what capitalization is and uses ellipsis improperly (as a replacement for punctuation)? Not to mention does not know how to read and/or follow policies/rules.
You're about as credible as Casey Anthony critiquing one's parenting skills.
Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski April 1, 2012 at 08:24 pm
Relating back to the blog post.... That is a sticky situation. I don't know exactly how I feel about it except to say that if the mother to be isn't happy with her choice, that could interfere with her ability to attach properly to the infant, and could also take it's toll on the health of the pregnancy.
Le'ah Keturah-Sarah Krzywkowski April 1, 2012 at 08:28 pm
Good point Jack. I was thinking the same thing.
Tiffany Jones April 3, 2012 at 04:30 pm
Icky to want a child that is genetically related to both spouses? Icky that the extended family is supportive enough to go this far to help a childless couple? Or icky that you would assume that the mother is somehow either being forced, or is making a bad decision? Icky that people would make such assumptions just because it is a choice they themselves wouldn't make, or perhaps have been fortunate enough to never have to contemplate!
Tiffany Jones April 3, 2012 at 10:18 pm
I can't help but wonder what America would look like if people stopped judging what others do in the bedroom (or elsewhere) to create a family. Everyone has a right to pursue their own happiness. Whether my happiness means spending thousands to adopt, spending thousands on infertility treatments, or spending thousands on birthing a child shouldn't concern anyone else. Also not all couples CAN legally adopt
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
michaelschwartz June 17, 2013 at 09:21 pm
Agreed. New site is much too busy and/or confusing. Old format was easy to navigate and followRead More certain stories , a very cumbersome ordeal now. Thumbs down on the change.
Diane H. Dreizen June 18, 2013 at 05:19 pm
I agree. I had even been tempted to start a blog just before this new and "improved"Read More layout. No longer interested in doing that - can't find anything on this patch.
Garry Kanter June 14, 2013 at 04:07 pm
That's odd. I was at the previous meeting, my first - on Global Warming, paid dues for the firstRead More time ever, wrote down my e-mail more than once, and still had no idea there was a meeting was last night.
Patti Weber Flanagin June 13, 2013 at 01:28 pm
Location is on Ormond Road, between Lee and South Taylor (the Heights main library is on the corner)
bachtobroadway42 June 17, 2013 at 12:00 pm
Along those lines, Diane, I thought an indoor greenhouse would be a good idea. Classes on how toRead More create gardens, grow food, store and preserve food would be an asset to the City.
Glinda Smith June 18, 2013 at 12:52 pm
Diane H. Dreizen & bachtobroadway42 - what interesting ideas! I'd love to see the whole messRead More raised and the area turned into a public park/recreation area with walking trails, bicycle paths, community gardens, etc. It seems the wind turbines could be in a place like that too. That's my dream, but we'll probably get some hideous redundant commercial development instead.
Denise Hilow Miller June 19, 2013 at 01:45 pm
Fantastic ideas. I think a combo of retail and new green technology would be awesome. This is aRead More chance for CH to be innovative and show that it's not about the bottom dollar - it's about preserving what we have. DOES ANYONE KNOW WHEN THE NEXT MEETING IS - I WILL BE THERE!!!
Garry Kanter June 7, 2013 at 03:55 pm
sb: this column
Denise Hilow Miller June 11, 2013 at 04:19 pm
Just ignore them then. The important thing is what we're talking about HERE.
Garry Kanter June 11, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Please join the conversation. The proposed school bond would be a timely starting point!