This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

Refurbished CH-UH school buildings will save energy & money


Figure 1: Energy Star National K-12 energy use building data for 2012 <http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/downloads/datatrends/DataTrends_Schools_20121006.pdf>

The current buildings in the District consume between 150* to 218 thousand BTUs per square foot each year.[http://chuhfacilities.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/s3-SWGAppendix.pdf, pages 17-20] The Board of Eduction accepted Facilities plan includes a performance goal of mid-30's thousand BTUs per square foot per year. This is consistent with construction practices specified by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and the American Institute of Architects (AIA) documents for current K-12 buildings.["Advanced Energy Design Guide for K-12 School Buildings: Achieving 50% Energy Savings Toward a Net Zero Energy Building," American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Special Project 134, 2011. (LFC/SWG has copies.) <http://aedg.ashrae.org/Download.aspx?type=registrants&aedg=84&source=

47dcbba0-439a-4d69-8356-6996270f13bf>] Achieving this goal requires substantial building envelope rework along with HVAC systems replacement. The cost is greater than can be accomplished by using the District's Capital Improvement Fund.

Find out what's happening in Cleveland Heightswith free, real-time updates from Patch.

It is worth noting that the best K-12 buildings use 15 to 20 thousand BTUs per square foot per year. <http://chuhfacilities.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/s5-034-045_Richardsville.pdf> Such buildings are intended to be net zero energy consumers. The CH-UH Facilities plan does not push that far. One could ask what would be the cost/benefit analysis of going that far, but it has not been done to this point. Only citizen advocacy will drive such a study, as the resources and expertise available to the Lay Facilities Committee could not afford it.

The planned energy savings is greater than or equal to a 5X reduction. The near term cost savings depends on the mix of electricity and natural gas consumed over the next 5-10 years. Electricity historically has cost 3X more than natural gas because of the inefficiency of converting a fossil fuel to electricity. As electricity becomes produced by other than fossil fuels over the next 50-100 year lifetime of the refurbished buildings, the cost of electricity will likely become cheaper than natural gas. (The current natural gas boom from fracking is projected by some to be a 10-25 year phenomena.<http://www.postcarbon.org/reports/DBD-report-FINAL.pdf>) Therefore, the expected cost savings depends on the heating system chosen, for example, gas furnaces or electricity driven geothermal heating, and the energy markets of the future. Energy Savings Performance Contractors, who make a profit from installing and cost sharing the savings, consulted during this last year for the Facilities plan guessed it might be on the order of 70% of the approximately $2.2 million being spent currently.

Find out what's happening in Cleveland Heightswith free, real-time updates from Patch.

This author thinks that fiscal responsibility and environmental stewardship dictate that a facilities overhaul by the District, with substantial energy savings, is prudent.

*The 1970's buildings use around 150 thousand BTUs per square foot per year, while the 1950's buildings use 200 thousand+ BTUs per square foot per year.

Disclosure: Allen Wilkinson was a member of the Sustainability Working Group (SWG) of the Lay Facilities Committee (LFC) and is running for the Board of Education.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?

More from Cleveland Heights